Reading Comprehension · Level 8 · المستوى 8
Attention in the Age of the Scroll
الانتباه في عصر التمرير

Read the text
اقرأ النصEvery generation seems to fear that new technology will ruin the minds of the young. Socrates worried that writing would weaken memory; nineteenth-century critics warned that novels would make readers idle and emotional. It is tempting, therefore, to dismiss today's concern about smartphones as simply the latest version of an old anxiety.
Tempting, but perhaps premature. Unlike books, digital platforms are deliberately designed to capture and hold attention, often by offering a constant stream of short, rewarding fragments. Several studies suggest that people reading on screens tend to skim more and remember less of long, complex texts than those reading on paper, although the difference narrows when readers are trained to slow down. The concern, in other words, is not that screens make reading impossible, but that they make a particular kind of reading — sustained, patient, reflective — less habitual.
Defenders of digital reading point out, with justification, that young people today read and write more words than any previous generation. Messages, comments and articles fill their days. Screens also provide access to libraries of material that were once available only to a privileged few. To judge this activity as inferior simply because it is different may say more about the critic than the reader.
Both positions contain truth, and the most persuasive conclusion may be that the medium matters less than the habit. Deep reading is not a natural ability that is either preserved or destroyed; it is a skill, built through practice, much like swimming or playing an instrument. A student who regularly reads long texts, on any device, will develop it. One who reads only fragments, on any device, will not.
If this is correct, the responsibility shifts. The question is no longer whether technology is good or bad for reading, but whether schools, families and readers themselves create regular space for the slow, demanding kind of attention that complex ideas require. In a world full of noise, that space will not appear by accident.
Answer the questions
أجب عن الأسئلة1. What is the editorial's main argument?
2. Why does the writer mention Socrates and nineteenth-century critics?
3. What do defenders of digital reading claim?
4. 'Tempting, but perhaps premature' suggests the writer thinks dismissing the concern…
5. 'less habitual' (paragraph 2) means…
6. 'may say more about the critic than the reader' implies critics may be…
Inference · استنتاج
7. What assumption do the critics of screens make?
Inference · استنتاج
8. Why does the writer compare deep reading to swimming or playing an instrument?
Inference · استنتاج
9. How does the writer treat the two opposing views?
Select the evidence · اختر الدليل
10. Which sentence gives research evidence?
Select the evidence · اختر الدليل
11. Which detail weakens the idea that screens are the main problem?
12. According to the conclusion, who is responsible for protecting deep reading?
Summary · التلخيص
13. Best summary?
Short answer · إجابة قصيرة
14. In a few words, what matters more than the medium, according to the writer?
Practice freely — nothing is saved.تدرّب بحرية، لا يتم حفظ أي إجابة أو نتيجة.
Back to the 8 levels →